by Robin Smithuis and Ruud Pijnappel
Radiology department, Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp and Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) represents 25-30% of all reported breast cancers.
Approximately 95% of all DCIS is diagnosed because of mammographically detected microcalcifications. In this review we will focus on:
The images in this article are non-compressed images for better resolution. This may take more time for your computer to download. |
|||
Anatomy |
|||
Terminal ductal lobular unitThe basic functional unit in the breast is the lobule, also called the terminal ductal lobular unit (TDLU). The terminal ductal lobular unit is an important structure because most invasive cancers arise from the TDLU. |
|||
|
Lobular calcifications Intraductal calcifications |
|||
Diagnostic Approach |
|||
|
The diagnostic approach to breast calcifications is to analyze the morphology, distribution and sometimes change over time. |
|||
MorphologyThe form of calcifications is the most important factor in the differentiation between benign and malignant. If calcifications cannot be readily identified as typically benign or as 'high probability of malignancy', they are termed of 'intermediate concern or suspicious'. If a specific etiology cannot be given, a description of the calcifications should include their morphology and distribution using the descriptions given in the BI-RADS atlas (1). |
|||
DistributionIn the BI-RADS atlas the following descriptions are given for the distribution of calcifications (1) :
|
|||
|
Diffuse or scattered distribution is typically seen in benign entities. Regional distribution according to the BI-RADS atlas would favor a non-ductal distribution (i.e. benignity), while Clustered calcifications are both seen in benign and malignant disease and are of intermediate concern. Linear distribution is typically seen when DCIS fills the entire duct and its branches with calcifications. |
|||
Change over timeThere are conflicting data concerning the value of absence of change over time. |
|||
|
In the same study it was shown that the odds for invasive carcinoma versus DCIS are statistically significantly higher among patients with increasing or new microcalcifications. |
|||
Benign Calcifications |
|||
|
Many calcifications can be classified as typically benign and need no follow up (i.e. BI-RADS 1 or 2). Skin Calcifications |
|||
|
Skin Calcifications (2) The cluster calcifications on the left was presented for biopsy. |
|||
|
Vascular Calcifications On the left typical vascular calcifications. |
|||
|
Coarse or 'Popcorn-like' |
|||
|
Large Rod-like, Plasma cell mastitis |
|||
|
Round and punctate calcifications Round and punctate calcifications can be seen in fibrocystic changes or adenosis, skin calcifications, skin talc and rarely in DCIS. Round and punctate calcifications are classified as:
|
|||
|
Lucent-Centered |
|||
|
Eggshell or Rim Calcifications On the left a sharply defined lesion. |
|||
|
Milk of Calcium |
|||
|
Suture calcifications |
|||
|
Dystrophic calcifications |
|||
|
On the left more extensive dystrophic calcifications. |
|||
Suspicious Calcifications |
|||
|
If calcifications are not typically benign, they are either called 'Suspicious or of Intermediate Concern' |
|||
Amorphous calcificationsAmorphous or indistinct calcifications are defined as 'without a clearly defined shape or form'. On the left amorphous and pleomorphic calcifications. |
|||
|
Amorphous calcifications (2) |
|||
|
Amorphous calcifications (3)
On the left amorphous calcifications within a denser area of the breast. |
|||
Coarse HeterogeneousCoarse heterogeneous microcalcifications, formerly called coarse granular, are irregular, conspicuous calcifications that are generally larger than 0.5 mm. On the left coarse heterogeneous calcifications |
|||
|
Coarse Heterogeneous (2) The differential diagnosis of coarse heterogeneous calcifications includes:
Multiplicity and bilaterality of such calcifications favors a benign etiology. |
|||
High Probability of Malignancy |
|||
|
Calcifications with a higher probability of malignancy are fine pleomorphic and fine linear or fine linear branching. |
|||
Fine PleomorphicThese calcifications vary in size and shapes and are usually < 0.5 mm in diameter. On the left fine pleomorphic calcifications in a segmental and linear distribution. |
|||
|
On the left a mammogram demonstrating two forms of calcifications. |
|||
|
The calcifications on the left were detected on the first mammogram in a screening program. |
|||
|
On the left a case that looks quite similar to the one above. |
|||
Fine Linear or Fine Linear BranchingThese are thin, linear or curvilinear irregular calcifications. On the left calcifications in a segmental distribution. |
|||
|
On the left fine linear and branching calcifications in a segmental distribution highly suggestive of malignancy (Bi-RADS 5). Extensive high grade DCIS was found at biopsy. |
|||
|
On the left a patient with new calcifications detected in a screening program. |
|||
Artifacts |
|||
|
On the left artifacts within a cassette that simulate fine pleomorphic calcifications. |
|||
|
Image of the cassette. |
|||
|
The image on the left shows the same artifacts. |
-
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System® (BI-RADS®) Atlas
The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System® (BI-RADS®) Atlas is a quality assurance guide to standardize breast-imaging reporting and to facilitate outcome monitoring. -
Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases
by Sickles EA.
Radiology 1991; 179: 463-468. -
Stability of malignant breast microcalcifications (PDF)
by AS Lev-Toaff, et al
Radiology, Vol 192, 153-156 - Diagnostic Imaging BREAST
First Edition
by Wendie E. Berg
Amirsys -
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Inter- and Intraobserver Variability in Feature Analysis and Final Assessment
by Wendie A. Berg et al
Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene St., Baltimore,
AJR 2000; 174:1769-1777 -
Use of Microcalcification Descriptors in BI-RADS 4th Edition to Stratify Risk of Malignancy
by Elizabeth S. Burnside et al
Radiology 2007;242:388-395. -
Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications
by R M Pijnappel et al
British Journal of Radiology (2004) 77, 312-314 -
Calcification in breast lesions: pathologists' perspective
by G M Tse et al
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:145-151 -
Signs in Imaging: The Tattoo Sign
by Rina L. Loffman Felman
Radiology 2002;223:481-482. -
BI-RADS Lexicon for US and Mammography: Interobserver Variability and Positive Predictive Value
by E. Lazarus, M. B. Mainiero, B. Schepps, S. L. Koelliker, and L. S. Livingston
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 385 - 391. -
Calcifications of Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
by Dianne Georgian-Smith et al
AJR 2001; 176:1255-1259 -
The Pendent View, An Additional Projection to Confirm the Diagnosis of Milk of Calcium
by Linda Moy, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Eren D. Yeh, Richard Moore, Elizabeth Rafferty, Kathleen A. McCarthy, Deborah Hall and Daniel B. Kopans
AJR 2001; 177:173-175 -
Sedimented calcium in benign breast cysts: the full spectrum of mammographic presentations
by SS Linden and EA Sickles
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 152, Issue 5, 967-971
Abstract and PDF -
MRI Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Constance D. Lehman, M.D., Ph.D., Constantine Gatsonis, Ph.D., Christiane K. Kuhl, M.D. et al
NEJM Volume 356:1295-1303 March 29, 2007 Number 13

































