Differentiation with CT and PET-CT
Ann Leung and Robin Smithuis
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California and the Department of Radiology, Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
The differential diagnosis of a solitary pulmonary nodule is broad and management depends on whether the lesion is benign or malignant.
In this overview we will discuss some of the new features that can help to differentiate between benign and malignant nodules based upon CT and PET-CT findings. |
|||
CT: benign versus malignant |
|||
CalcificationDiffuse, central, laminated or popcorn calcifications are benign patterns of calcification. The exception to the rule above is when patients are known to have a primary tumor. |
|||
SizeA solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is defined as a single intraparenchymal lesion less than 3 cm in size and not associated with atelectasis or lymphadenopathy. Swensen et al studied the relationship between the size of a SPN and the chance of malignancy in a cohort at high risk for lung cancer (1). |
|||
GrowthComparison with prior imaging studies is often the most useful procedure to determine the importance of the finding of a SPN, since stability over 2 years is highly associated with benignity. |
|||
ShapeJapanese screening studies showed that a polygonal shape and a three-dimensional ratio > 1.78 was a sign of benignity (2,3). The three-dimensional ratio is measured by obtaining the maximal transverse dimension and dividing it by the maximal vertical dimension. |
|||
Margin
|
|||
Air Bronchogram signRecent studies have showed that an air bronchogram is more commonly seen in malignant pulmonary nodules. The case on the left shows an airbronchogram seen as a linear lucency (broad arrow) and as a more cystic lucency (small arrow) due to the fact that the bronchus is seen en face. |
|||
|
On the left two solitary pulmonary nodules. The lesion on the far left has a spicuated margin and has lucencies within it. |
|||
Solid and Ground-glass componentsAnother result from screening studies is that nodules containing a ground-glass component are more likely to be malignant (5).
|
|||
|
On the far left a lesion that only has a ground-glass appearance and next to it a lesion that has both ground-glass and solid components. |
|||
Contrast enhancementContrast enhancement less than 15 HU has a very high predictive value for benignity (99%).
|
|||
PET-CT: benign versus malignant |
|||
|
PET-CT plays an increasingly important role in the evaluation of solitary nodules. When you perform PET-CT, you have to realize the following:
With these specificity numbers, there will be false positives in about 20%, depending on the background prevalence of granulomatous disease. |
|||
Conclusion |
|||
|
In the differentiation of benign versus malignant solitary pulmonary nodules nowadays new imaging features have to be added. With the increasingly important role of PET-CT, we have to be aware of the accuracy of PET-CT and we should have an idea about the prevalence of infectious and non-infectious granulomatous disease in the area that we practice. |
-
CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Five-year Prospective Experience
Stephen J. Swensen et al
Radiology 2005;235:259-265. -
Indeterminate Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Revealed at Population-Based CT Screening of the Lung: Using First Follow-Up Diagnostic CT to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Lesions
Shodayu Takashima et al.
AJR 2003; 180:1255-1263 -
Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (1 cm) Detected at Population-Based CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Reliable High-Resolution CT Features of Benign Lesions
Shodayu Takashima et al.
AJR 2003; 180:955-964 -
CT Screening for Lung Cancer Frequency and Significance of Part-Solid and Nonsolid Nodules
Claudia I. Henschke et al
AJR 2002; 178:1053-1057











